Home

Teacher's guide for advanced International journalism

« previous entry | next entry »
Jun. 19th, 2005 | 09:44 am


Lesson One
OVERSEAS MEDIA ARE INDEPENDENT, EVEN JAPANESE MEDIA
A news assistant in our office will graduate this month with a news and communications bachelor's degree from Peking University, which Chinese like to call an "elite school." They studied AP, Reuters and Kyodo, especially their history and whatever influence each agency has wreaked around the world. Kyodo of course was the mouthpiece of imperial Japan that invaded China in 1931. She was never taught that these media, based today in democratic countries, operate with no government investment or government content control. Her first days at Kyodo back in April were like reeducation camp.
Lesson Two
OVERSEAS MEDIA ARE INDEPENDENT, EVEN JAPANESE MEDIA
When I asked He Yong, media liaison for the Beijing International Fund for Animal Welfare, about why China should oppose Japanese whale hunting, he replied: "You couldn't report that." Excuse me for presuming your ignorance, I thought, but I'm going to tell you: "Kyodo is independent. Japan doesn't control us. We can say what we want about Japan or China." Surprise, surprise, this is exactly what He Yong didn't know and what prompted his comment.
Lesson Three
OVERSEAS MEDIA ARE INDEPENDENT, EVEN JAPANESE MEDIA
In December anti-Japan protest leader Zhang Jianyong, about 30, white collar, declined to answer a Kyodo question about his 20-minute banner-and-bullhorn session in front of the Japanese Embassy in Beijing because Kyodo represented "Japanese media." No Japanese media, Zhang said at the Q&A following. A Reuters reporter repeated the Kyodo question and got an answer. Later Kyodo called a more senior protest leader to invite him and Zhang and the whole gang to drop by the Kyodo office and look at our clips on Chinese protests against Japan. He didn't come but Zhang's group didn't block our questions after that.
Lesson Four
OVERSEAS MEDIA ARE INDEPENDENT, EVEN JAPANESE MEDIA
"Developed countries, class, veer toward a government system called democracy, a set of principles and procedures that your teacher can't fully explain in this class," the teacher we fired for Party-line ignorance said. "Basically, they vote for their presidents, otherwise they carry on politically pretty much the same as we do (hack hack, excuse me, class, while I gargle with mouthwash). So we can assume that the news agencies of foreign countries also carry on as ours do here. They must obey the News Law, meaning if the government doesn't like a story, it gets spiked or the paper gets shut down." One in 500 students will be confronted with the truth in the sort of embarrassing or ungainly situations noted in previous lessons.
Exam Review
OK boys and girls, we've studied OVERSEAS MEDIA ARE INDEPENDENT, EVEN JAPANESE MEDIA for a week (month, semester, year) now. But I know you still may not get it or get it but not accept it because as children growing up under communism, paternalism and Xinhua News Agency, you cannot imagine press that doesn't follow the leader and defend the family honor as defined by papa. Try one more time to get your brain on top of it -- government here in this pile, big barrier next to it, media over there in that pile, another barrier, and the citizens wherever they want to be, listening to the media or the government or no one at all. News readers avariciously want to know about negative news involving their country, and the media serve their readers, part of this free market media concept that we'll push on you next semester. And if papa happens to get stuck in your stinky ink, there's not a whole lot he or Senator So-and-so or the Minister of Such-and-such can do about it except wet their pants.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {5}

American news

from: anonymous
date: Jun. 20th, 2005 06:30 pm (UTC)
Link

Where the U.S. media when the White House was pandering lies about aluminum tubes or Nigerian uranium procurement contracts? Where was the U.S. media when the Saddam son-in-law defectee in charge nuclear and biological programs in Iraq (called by none other than Cheney 'a reliable source') said all WMD had been destroyed?

What about the Downing Street Memo? AP sure dropped the ball on that one, I would say.

Yet editorials in the States say, "The Downing Street Memo is not news--we knew all that."

Excuse me. But isn't that the height of cynicism? We know the president is lying but we don't impeach him.

In the States, this kind of cynicism renders apathetic and impotent large swaths of people who ought to know better.

So many people from the Land of the Free come to China and say, "Don't you guys know you are lied to all the time?"

"Duh. Of course. At least we know it, brother," Chinese person replies.

Which is not to say that Chinese propaganda does not do its job.

Anyway, I'm sure Kyodo is very good. I've also had very good experience with German newspapers. I don't read French.

Reply | Thread

Re: American news

from: anonymous
date: Jun. 21st, 2005 01:27 pm (UTC)
Link

Obviously you haven't been reading the US newspapers.

Reply | Parent | Thread

Re: American news

from: anonymous
date: Jun. 23rd, 2005 12:22 am (UTC)
Link

What do you think of the Bill Moyers and Ken Tomlinson story? Interesting that Kenny boy used to run VOA.

Let's get real... Those editorial meetings where Mr. Hollywood says, "No one wants to read that." Oh pretty, pretty pretty please Mr. Hollywood, can we put it on the second page?

Reply | Parent | Thread

Re: American news

from: anonymous
date: Jun. 23rd, 2005 11:25 am (UTC)
Link

"What do you think of the Bill Moyers and Ken Tomlinson story?" Not much. Speaking of getting real, the mainstream media (including PBS) tilts so far left that it's not even worth a discussion. Have you ever even spoken to more than one reporter about their political affiliation?

As for the cover-up, why don't you just "Google" or "Google News" any of those topics you've listed above and see what you get. It took me 15 seconds to find your missing news.

Here is your AP dispatch on the Downing Street Memo (via USA Today): http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-06-16-democrats-memo_x.htm

Here is Editor and Publisher commenting on editorials ("Survey Finds Editorial Treatment of 'Downing Street Memo' Mixed")on the Downing Street memo: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000962804

I could go on, but I leave the rest to you. Why don't you open your eyes and see?


Reply | Parent | Thread

lalaoshi

Re: American news

from: [info]lalaoshi
date: Jun. 23rd, 2005 05:12 pm (UTC)
Link

The problem to which you refer afflicts most news wire services. Wires, including Kyodo, traditionally follow news rather than investigate it. Wire reporters react to events as they hear about them and relay the news, as described by authorities, to other media clients, which can do whatever they want with it -- publish the wire report, read it for reference or use it to wipe up spilt coffee. You could say AP dropped the ball, but AP might argue (pure speculation here) that as a wire it wasn't their ball, even their sport, to check that story down to the last possible source and detail.

Reply | Parent | Thread